nanog mailing list archives
Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () cic net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 17:21:43 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Philip J. Nesser II wrote:
Could we agree on a fixed width interface designation? fe instead of fastether? tk instead of token? etc..
Why fixed width? Given that different gear can accomodate different mix of interfaces, the naming goop on the left side of domain name will be variable length. -dorian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Peter Lothberg (Jan 06)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Dima Volodin (Jan 06)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Avi Freedman (Jan 06)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Alex.Bligh (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Dorian R. Kim (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Dorian R. Kim (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links John W. Stewart III (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Jerry Scharf (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Wayne Bouchard (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Perry E. Metzger (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links John Hawkinson (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Alex.Bligh (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Alex.Bligh (Jan 08)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links David Carmean (Jan 07)
- Re: Domain names for ISP infrastructure links Wayne Bouchard (Jan 07)