nanog mailing list archives
Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 11:23:38 +0000
On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:32:03 -0500 "Justin W. Newton" <justin () erols com> wrote:
A BGP withdrawl for a route which is not in the routing table does not cause the router to update any routes and is hence not a routing update. I.e. removing a route that isn't there is not very processor intensive.
Thats irrelevent, what it is doing is _broken_ and it should be fixed and implemented. Neil. -- Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. Domino: In the glow of the night. neil () DOMINO ORG NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?), (continued)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Dorian R. Kim (Jan 13)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Jeff Young (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Jon Zeeff (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Hank Nussbacher (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Tony Li (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Dorian R. Kim (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Avi Freedman (Jan 15)