nanog mailing list archives
Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting
From: "Philip J. Nesser II" <pjnesser () martigny ai mit edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 14:19:05 -0500 (EST)
Avi Freedman supposedly said:
We are not ignoring the complaints. I have contacted the spammers and asked them to stop the unsolicited emails. Problem is that they are not always our direct customer, so they see us as no threat since we are not their direct upstream provider. I would just like to see what other large providers are doing about this problem so we can come to a common policy. EricAs I said, a meeting about this would be good... If consensus builds perhaps a community document would then be in order... Avi
This topic is the main effort of the IETF WG RUN(Responsible Use of the Network) which is just getting started on it. If we had such a meeting at NANOG I will be sure to take notes and bring them up to the RUN group, since there goal is to create such a document. ---> Phil - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Avi Freedman (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Eric D. Madison (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Avi Freedman (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Eric D. Madison (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Avi Freedman (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Barry Shein (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Paul A Vixie (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Mike Leber (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting David Schwartz (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Eric D. Madison (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Avi Freedman (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Paul A Vixie (Jan 20)
- Re: Suggestion for NANOG Meeting Philip J. Nesser II (Jan 21)