nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering charges?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 02:38:55 -0800
Jonathan Heiliger <loco () isi net> wrote:
Large ISPs should probably be interested in access to content, without it their users could find the Internet a very boring place.
Not only that. They are also interested in peer's customer population gaining access to content (and ads) published by their own customers. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: peering charges?, (continued)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Jon Zeeff (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? John (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Jon Zeeff (Jan 27)
- Re: peering charges? Alex.Bligh (Jan 28)
- Re: peering charges? Jeff Young (Jan 29)
- Re: peering charges? Paul A Vixie (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Todd Graham Lewis (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Jan 26)
- Re: peering charges? Michael Dillon (Jan 26)