nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Backbone Index
From: "Alex.Bligh" <amb () xara net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 23:27:20 +0100
The router side could turn the argument. "With a routed backbone, you can actually SEE what is happening to your packets. It is not a hidden unknown, thus prone to failure you can not diagnose. With routers you know it went bad at nqu1. With switches, it just went bad."
Cynics mike argue that lack of end user visibility of network problems is a compelling argument *for* NSPs to deploy switched backbones ... ("No, our backbone is just fine, { the NAP lost your packet | it got stolen by the packet fairies } " etc ...) Alex Bligh Xara Networks
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Backbone Index, (continued)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Robert Laughlin (Jul 09)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Sean Donelan (Jul 09)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Gary Zimmerman (Jul 10)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Michael Dillon (Jul 10)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Ken Leland (Jul 10)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Michael Dillon (Jul 10)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Mike Leber (Jul 10)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Dorian R. Kim (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Dorian R. Kim (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Randy Bush (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Alex.Bligh (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Stephen Balbach (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Dorian R. Kim (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Stephen Balbach (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Dorian R. Kim (Jul 13)
- Benefits of switching at L2 Alan Hannan (Jul 13)
- Re: Benefits of switching at L2 Dorian R. Kim (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Sean M. Doran (Jul 14)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Michael Dillon (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 13)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Randy Bush (Jul 13)