nanog mailing list archives
Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 13:16:59 -0400
On Wed, Jul 16, 1997 at 04:21:48PM -0800, Ron Buchalski wrote:
The key is to go with multiple suppliers who can guarantee diverse routes. Carriers lease capacity from each other in some cases, so Sprint and MCI can give you circuits in the same physical fiber.
Actually, in light of the conversation we've been having about carriers flagging routes that are part of diversity pairs, what happens is you get two circuits for such service from separate carriers. Would they have any way of avoiding co-lo'ing the circuits? Is there an intercompany tag for circuit paths? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "People propose, science studies, technology Tampa Bay, Florida conforms." -- Dr. Don Norman +1 813 790 7592
Current thread:
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom, (continued)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Perry E. Metzger (Jul 18)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Robert E. Seastrom (Jul 18)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom David Schiffrin (Jul 18)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Peter E. Giza (Jul 17)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Scott Yoneyama (Jul 18)
- Message not available
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 18)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Anthony Pardini (Jul 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 17)
- RE: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Jim Browne (Jul 16)
- RE: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Rusty H. Hodge (Jul 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 16)