nanog mailing list archives
Re: question about per. hack
From: George Herbert <gherbert () crl com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 17:31:32 -0700
The damaged party in the denial-of-service attack earlier (InterNIC) has, undoubtedly, filed proper reports and can't talk about them. These investegations take time, and there's no reason for the Feds to work faster right now because the faked .per and .nic domains aren't hurting anyone and Eugene has stopped knocking legitimate domains down. MCI and Sprint, however, have dissapointed me. Their security contacts are not responding (IMHO) appropriately. I have a hard time believing that Eugene still doesn't realize how serious this all is. And yet he's playing up press coverage of it at his web site, and still posting around lists apparently blase about it. -george william herbert gherbert () crl com
Current thread:
- Re: question about per. hack Paul A Vixie (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack rbenn (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack Paul A Vixie (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack Marc Hurst (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack George Herbert (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack Marc Hurst (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack David Mercer (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack MFS (Jul 22)
- Re: question about per. hack Paul A Vixie (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack MFS (Jul 22)
- Re: question about per. hack rbenn (Jul 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: question about per. hack Francois Beauregard (Jul 21)
- Re: question about per. hack Ray Davis (Jul 22)
- Re: question about per. hack Tim Gibson (Jul 22)
- Re: question about per. hack Ray Davis (Jul 22)
- Re: question about per. hack Ray Davis (Jul 22)