nanog mailing list archives
Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 01:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Eric Germann wrote:
However, a coordinated effort to block them all could, correct? Kind of like the sanity filters at customer borders. Don't allow traffic into your network that doesn't originate from their assigned network numbers. If everyone were to block the ranges no one would get polluted... So is it my understanding that it is technically possible, but logistically impossible to coordinate? If we were to block them, then we wouldn't have
Probably. We can't even get everyone to adopt sanity filters for IP traffic. Now you want everyone to packet filter themselves from certain name servers? ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. Florida Digital Turnpike | ________Finger jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net for PGP public key_______
Current thread:
- Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Eric Germann (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Karl Denninger (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Eric Germann (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Jon Lewis (Jul 23)
- Re: Kashpureff Black List (REALLY AN OPERATIONAL QUESTION) Karl Denninger (Jul 23)