nanog mailing list archives
RE: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
From: "Wheeler, Jesse W" <jesse_wheeler () reyrey com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 14:05:45 -0700
So are we all going to all resort to name calling now to get our points across? Every time you deal with a dynamic object such as the Internet, where conditions can change on a minute by minute basis, benchmark results are close to useless. The only thing that benchmarks on a dynamic object can do is give you a rough estimate of the actual throughput.. The variables to be tested in something massive as the Internet and too numerous to count.. SO, lets get on with it :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ Jesse W. Wheeler Quality Assurance Analyst Reynolds & Reynolds Healthcare Systems Division Email: Jesse_Wheeler () reyrey com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------
---------- From: Jack Rickard[SMTP:jack.rickard () boardwatch com] Sent: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:00 PM To: Ben Black; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! I'm not a marketing droid. But only a moron would think that overall performance would NOT affect the download of a web page, which is essentially what you are attempting to say. There are certainly other ways to do it. Approximately Internet User Population raised to Internet User Population worth. Jack RIckard =================================================================== Jack Rickard Boardwatch Magazine Editor/Publisher 8500 West Bowles Ave., Ste. 210 jack.rickard () boardwatch com Littleton, CO 80123 www.boardwatch.com Voice: (303)973-6038 =================================================================== ----------From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net> To: Craig A. Huegen <c-huegen () quadrunner com> Cc: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard () boardwatch com>; Peter Cole<Peter.Cole () telescan com>; nanog () merit edu; marketing () keynote comSubject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:28 PM for an exmple of somewhat more complete and better designed benchmarks ofthis type: http://www.inversenet.com/about/backgrounder.html#2 note that they understand the numerous factors that contribute to overallperformance. only a marketing droid could think downloading 50k worth ofweb pages is somehow an indicator of overall performance. b3n
Current thread:
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! George Herbert (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! George Herbert (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Wheeler, Jesse W (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jeff Young (Jun 29)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Michael Dillon (Jun 30)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! George Herbert (Jun 27)