nanog mailing list archives
Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 21:10:25 -0400 (EDT)
still more awe inspiring is the release of such obviously useless and misleading data which is then defended on the basis of vapor stats nobody outside of your organization has seen. spout all you want about the data to be released RSN. until we see it, you should probably stop babbling. On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:
Phil: Actually, you have hardly seen ANY of the results of the test. This is probably what has me stymied. You saw a very very simple, summary listing of the average download times comparing 29 networks, issued in a two page press release. The RESULTS of the Survey are contained in TWO articles with about 35 PAGES OF GRAPHS, and ten pages of text or so answering most of this. Copies will go out next week. That there is a lot of opinion of flaws in the logic, absolutely predating any of these people SEEING the results, is awe inspiring. Jack Rickard ----------From: Philip J. Nesser II <pjnesser () martigny ai mit edu> To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 3:05 PM We have all seen the results of the survey now and there is a lot of opinion that there are many flaws in the logic. So the question is whatisa legitimate test? I remember At the Ann Arbor NANOG there was a reportona project to test reachability, what is the current status of thatproject?Is there any strong consensus to perform a similar test that isengineeredwithout the flaws in this test? ---> Phil
Current thread:
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!, (continued)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Catherine Anne Foulston (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Craig A. Huegen (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Myk O'Leary (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jeff Young (Jun 29)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Philip J. Nesser II (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Mike Hedlund (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Taner Halicioglu (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Mike Hedlund (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Peter E. Giza (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Joseph McDonald (Jun 27)
- Effect of cache/redirect on Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index Scott Huddle (Jun 28)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! J.D. Falk (Jun 29)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
(Thread continues...)