nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Big Squeeze
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 11:00:17 -0500
At 10:48 AM 3/2/97 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's the renumbering part that I think gives people the most heartburn... By the time you get "big enough" to warrent your own block, you've got at least 32 ClassCs of which, I'm betting, at least 28 are "given" to LAN-connected customers. This is a _major_ headache not only for the ISP to go thru but also a major headache to force your customers to go thru. That is, what I think, is what really is most painful; that by the time you are big enough to have your own block, you're too big to want to renumber: Catch 22
Que sera, sera. Renumbering is a fact of life. See: RFC1900, RFC2008, RFC2071. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The Big Squeeze, (continued)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Kim Hubbard (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Nathan Stratton (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul A Vixie (Mar 01)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Jim Jagielski (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Michael Dillon (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Nathan Stratton (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Jim Jagielski (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Scott Huddle (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Kim Hubbard (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
(Thread continues...)