nanog mailing list archives

Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements


From: Henry Kilmer <hank () rem com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 14:42:43 -0500 (EST)


Vince Fuller writes:
I can see why you present inconsistant routes to us but I'm not sure that I
understand why you'd prefer a customer prefix via a direct connection to them
at one point in your network but via a connection to another provider at a
different point in your network. That would seem internally inconsistant to
me. Is this deliberate behavior to do shortest-exit within your network toward
your customer?

We have some customers that have specifically requested this sort of arrangement.

-Hank
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: