nanog mailing list archives

Re: Domain Rant.


From: Hong Chen <hchen () aimnet net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 16:15:12 -0800 (PST)


Yes, we have to do something about it. Recently, I have seen 
several large ISPs got affected by Internic. 

I know for sure that both Aimnet.net and Internex.net are
putting on hold, despite the fact that Aimnet.net already 
paid and our check was cashed 2 days before they put us 
on hold. 

You just cannot imagine how many our customers are getting
affected. CRL, Aimnet, and Internex likes are major ISPs with
hundred and thousands of corporate customers using their 
services.

George, we are fully behind you on this. 



Hong Chen                               408-567-3800 (tel)
hchen () aimnet net                     408-567-0990 (fax)

On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, George Herbert wrote:


Whether or not InterNIC feels like putting people who haven't
paid on hold, doing so to people who have paid is completely
irresponsible.  Despite having cancelled check literally in hand,
I'm on hold.  I got a notice 10 days ago and sent them a response
that i had the cancelled check.  TODAY, they put me on hold and said 
"sorry, we have no record of this, please send us the check
date and details" rather than ask me that first and then
put me on hold if I couldn't provide them.

I will be lobbying to have InterNICs contract voided immediately
for failure to keep proper records and act in a responsible
manner with its fee operations if this goes on.  The "is registry
something that is charged for" debate is one thing, but gross
mismanagement is another.


-george william herbert
gherbert () crl com




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: