nanog mailing list archives
Re: Domain Rant.
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 19:39:14 -0800
So far, that sounds like nice basis for a class action lawsuit. Imagine a land title company throwing away records just because they lost a payment receipt. That's what InterNIC is doing. My experience with InterNIC was that i managed to get hold of actual person, and got assurances that everything's ok. Then i see nothing happened in the database, so i call again, and they tell the information "is not there yet". Now, i go to the automatic system and make a card payment -- the system gives back authorization code, etc. Guess what. It still says the domain registration is not paid. I think it is time ISPs take the matter in their hands. I.e. let ISPs to perform registrations. Root serer operators can ensure uniqueness just fine. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Domain Rant., (continued)
- Re: Domain Rant. Geoff White (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Steve Ferguson (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Robert B. Evans (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Hong Chen (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. bmanning (Mar 20)
- Re: Domain Rant. George Herbert (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. Paul A Vixie (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. [re: should be in iahc list if it existed] Tim Gibson (Mar 21)
- Re: Domain Rant. [re: should be in iahc list if it existed] Paul A Vixie (Mar 21)