nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet
From: Scott Bradner <sob () newdev harvard edu>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 16:32:13 -0500 (EST)
-- Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that the Electronic Communications Act of 1986 (?) makes it quite illegal to screw around with mail that you have accepted for delivery. -- spammers bill of rights? kinda don't think that would have been the aim. Scott - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Jonathan Clark (Mar 28)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Kevin Smith (Mar 28)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Brian Murrell (Mar 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Jonathan Clark (Mar 29)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Lon R. Stockton, Jr. (Mar 29)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Brian Murrell (Mar 29)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Kevin Smith (Mar 28)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Paul R.D. Lantinga (Mar 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Scott Bradner (Mar 29)
- Re: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Michael Dillon (Mar 29)
- RE: Anti-SPAM announcement from AT&T Worldnet Dave O'Shea (Mar 29)