nanog mailing list archives
Re: Firewall in Routers??
From: Brian Tackett <cym () acrux net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 10:48:07 -0600 (CST)
On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Andrew Smith wrote:
Agreed...but in certain situations, ie a widely diverse network, to follow this purist paradigm, you really need a separate firewall/ uniquely routed subnet. If someone has a 75XX with a T1 Internet connection, why not let the extra CPU go towards firewall functions.
Anyone who has a 75XX and a single T1 needs to be taken out back and shot by their overly generous accounts payable division ;) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Firewall in Routers?? Tim Crowell (Mar 03)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Paul Knight (Mar 03)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Andrew Smith (Mar 03)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Glynn Stanton (Mar 03)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Andrew Smith (Mar 03)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Michael Dillon (Mar 03)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Brian Tackett (Mar 04)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Robert Laughlin (Mar 04)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Paul R.D. Lantinga (Mar 04)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Glynn Stanton (Mar 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? William S. Duncanson (Mar 04)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? dave o'leary (Mar 05)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Robert Laughlin (Mar 05)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? dave o'leary (Mar 05)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? Glynn Stanton (Mar 05)
- Re: Firewall in Routers?? dave o'leary (Mar 05)