Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering

["William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson () greendragon com>]

In view of the difference, I would suggest that the web farms have a
case that UUnet should pay _them_ for the priveledge of accessing their
content!  Anytime UUnet asks for a fee for peering, just tell them that
you really consider them unequal, and that they should pay YOU!


> From: Mark Turner <markt () nsipo arc nasa gov>
> For NASA this is a current snapshot of NAP traffic
> exchange:
>
> mae-w:
>
> 5 minute input rate 2888000 bits/sec, 632 packets/sec
> 5 minute output rate 2949000 bits/sec, 718 packets/sec
>
> mae-e:
>
> 5 minute input rate 5458000 bits/sec, 2437 packets/sec
> 5 minute output rate 8041000 bits/sec, 2157 packets/sec
>
> The flows are constrained by an over-worked backbone,
> but as a general rule out > in.  As I said, web-farms
> and a small backbone will give you that :-)

WSimpson () UMich edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
BSimpson () MorningStar com
    Key fingerprint =  2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3  59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -