nanog mailing list archives
Re: [summary] Re: QoS/CoS interest
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 14:19:07 -0400
Oops. Forgot one: Number of respondents that mentioned that ISP's haven't quite figured out non-QoS services yet: 2 - paul At 01:56 PM 05/28/97 -0400, Paul Ferguson wrote:
[snip] Number of respondents: 19 Number of respondents who felt that better QoS 'knobs' were needed in the routers: 4 Number of respondents who felt that admission control and policing functionality was required: 2 Number of respondents who feel that QoS granularity at the IP source/destination and/or tcp/udp port level is sufficient: 2 Number of respondents that indicated that QoS should have the granularity to differentiate with per-flow granularity: 1 Number of respondents who need QoS differentiation for enhanced economic factors (charge more money): 4 Number of respondents who indicated that (paraphrased) QoS isn't interesting due to over-engineering: 2 Number of respondents who indicated that (paraphrased) QoS would indeed be interesting if they were congested: 1 Number of respondents that indicated that congestion management needs to be an integral part of any QoS implementation: 1 Number of respondents who indicated that until QoS routing was available, QoS was not interesting: 1 Number of respondents who indicated that inter-domain QoS transit was a major stumbling block: 6 Number of respondents that explicitly mentioned RSVP by name: 3 Number of respondents that explicitly mentioned RSVP in a favorable tone: 2 Number of respondents who indicated that QoS implementations, whatever they may be, needs to be pervasive, to include hosts: 2 Number of respondents who indicated that billing & accounting systems need to be developed for QoS: 4 Number of respondents who indicated that the term 'QoS' is too ambiguous: 2 Number of respondents who indicated they expect guaranteed delivery in a QoS implementation: 0 [snip]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: QoS/CoS interest, (continued)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest bill . st . arnaud (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Michael Dillon (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Stan Barber (May 21)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest pkavi (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Gary Zimmerman (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Scott Bradner (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest bill . st . arnaud (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Mike Trest (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Paul Ferguson (May 22)
- [summary] Re: QoS/CoS interest Paul Ferguson (May 28)
- Re: [summary] Re: QoS/CoS interest Paul Ferguson (May 28)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Greg Soprovich (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest Michael Dillon (May 22)
- Re: QoS/CoS interest bill . st . arnaud (May 22)