nanog mailing list archives
Re: Current prefix length filtering
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () blackrose org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 15:49:56 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
The real question I have for nanog is who is filtering on 209/8 for prefixes longer than /18? I'm quite concerned about connectivity to the customers I'm going to have to put in this /19. Have all the major providers started filtering on /19's or am I going to have major problems with this block?
Most people who filter recently allocated part of 192/2 space filter on /19s. Sprint originally filtered on /18s but relaxed that to coordinate better with registry allocation policies. -dorian
Current thread:
- Current prefix length filtering Forrest W. Christian (Nov 11)
- Re: Current prefix length filtering Dorian R. Kim (Nov 11)