nanog mailing list archives
Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
From: Rik Schneider <rik () master netasset com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 10:42:16 -0800 (PST)
What is your criteria for judging a message to be auto-flamed?
From the original posting it appears that any message ariving at nanog
will be responded to. How ever it is not clear if it resposnds to the list or to the sender. I kind of like the idea of a FLAME LOOP on a mailing list.
At 05:16 PM 11/12/97 +0000, Richard Welty wrote:in light of the ongoing discussions about what kind of subject matter is appropriate to the nanog mailing list, i have completed development of an "autoflamer" intended to detect any inappropriate postings to nanog and generate a suitable obnoxious response. in light of the difficulty of determing appropriateness of postings to nanog, it appears that all postings to nanog will have to be "autoflamed". this facility will be enabled on April 1st, 1998. cheers, richard -- Richard Welty Chief Internet Engineer, INet Solutionswelty () inet-solutions net http://www.inet-solutions.net/~welty/ 888-311-INET
Current thread:
- new facility for nanog mailing list Richard Welty (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Christofer Hoff (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Danny McPherson (Nov 12)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Paul G. Donner (Nov 13)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Rik Schneider (Nov 13)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Matthew D. Lammers (Nov 13)
- Re: new facility for nanog mailing list Richard Welty (Nov 13)