nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: 03 Nov 1997 12:01:33 -0500
Phil Howard <phil () charon milepost com> writes:
Test market a dialup service at a reduced rate that gives people a private space address behind a proxy server.
No, implement NAT in such a way that you can roll this service out without anyone noticing, except in the difficult case where an "inside" and "outside" address collision is triggered by using IP addresses rather than DNS names. Then once you've rolled it out, you can assign static IP addresses, large address ranges, and other popular shopping-list items that a number of users seem to want, to the extent that they are a market differentiator that in the absence of NAT favours less-conserving ISPs. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: moving to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Thomas Narten (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John Curran (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Thomas Narten (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jeremy Porter (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- IPsec processing & NAT (was Re: moving to IPv6) Ran Atkinson (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Gary E. Miller (Nov 05)