nanog mailing list archives
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 09:52:38 -0700
Would there be legal issues if the peers at the NAP/MAE etc. simply discarded traffic from the known spammer netblocks such as thehitman.com based on an acceptable use policy that prohibits sites which support spammer business?
this is what http://maps.vix.com/ is all about.
If traffic can't make it to their web sites it would make it harder to earn $ off spam even if the spam is sent from disposable accounts.
exactly true. and it works, btw.
Current thread:
- Web Biz Universal Remove List Update postmaster (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Greg A. Woods (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update J.D. Falk (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Jon Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update J.D. Falk (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Steve Mansfield (Oct 21)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Jon Lewis (Oct 21)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update NetSurfer (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Paul A Vixie (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update stickybit (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Richard Welty (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Paul A Vixie (Oct 20)