nanog mailing list archives
Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East
From: Shahin Bakhshandeh <shahin () isea com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 16:12:18 -0700
At 03:17 PM 10/23/97 -0700, Kachun Lee wrote:
In article <62j4ft$qav () news pathlink com>, you say...Once again, mae-west is experiencing problems between gigaswitch #1 and gigaswitch #2. We are seeing consistant, and high, loss between peers. MFS has at least one ticket open on this now. -- Dave Rand dlr () bungi com http://www.bungi.comDoes anyone has more status or insight to the MAE-WEST problem?
It looks like the FDDI link between gigaswitches is approaching saturation : http://207.53.84.41/MAE/west.gigalink.overlay.html
An ET when that may be resolved? Also, the 'upgrade' at MAE-EAST that dropped the Gigaswitch traffic from 1.2G to 0.5G/s, is that being viewed as a problem? Or, some type of new compression methods?
Perhaps they were measuring it incorrectly ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Kachun Lee (Oct 23)
- Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Deepak Jain (Oct 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Shahin Bakhshandeh (Oct 23)
- Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Dave Rand (Oct 23)