nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: David Bowie <dbowie () bbnplanet com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 16:05:24 -0500
Phil Lawlor wrote:
I am not a sendmail expert, but I am told that it is in the forgery area that it could be improved. Forgery and relay hijacking seem to be the largest areas of abuse. If these areas could be improved, it could go a long way to solving the problem.
I tend to agree with Phil - to a point. Nip it in the bud. Everyone could use some strengthening in their AUP and it is up to each ISP to come down hard on those who abuse the net. Ease of use, and the free flow of information must be maintained. Fraud, unrepentant misuse, and theft-of-services should result in loss of access. Zero-tolerance, and/or a charge structure (fines?) can be levied by ISPs to combat the scourge. -- David J. Bowie GTE Internetworking Powered by BBN
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Karl Denninger (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David Bowie (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Richard Welty (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 28)