nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 21:48:46 -0500
On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 03:41:19PM -0800, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Oct 29, Phil Lawlor <phil () agis net> wrote:AGIS is kicking this, along with other ideas around. We spent a great deal of resources on the IEMMC thing, and that didn't work out well. Thought I'd toss the caller ID idea out to get feedback from this list.I have to applaud you for this -- lots of folks didn't think the IEMMC thing would work (for exactly the same reasons that it failed, interestingly enough), but unfortunately there was no open channel of communication with y'all at that time. If there's interest, I'd be happy to start up a mailing list for backbone types to discuss this stuff, since there's likely to be some debate as to whether it's on-topic for this list.
nodlist () nodewarrior net. (I _think_ I've got that right; only the LHS is in my Mutt config file) Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "Pedantry. It's not just a job, it's an Tampa Bay, Florida adventure." -- someone on AFU +1 813 790 7592
Current thread:
- Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Mark Milhollan (Oct 29)
- Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Phil Lawlor (Oct 29)
- Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) J.D. Falk (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 29)
- Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) J.D. Falk (Oct 29)
- Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Greg A. Woods (Oct 29)
- Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Phil Lawlor (Oct 29)