nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Alan Hannan <hannan () bythetrees com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:06:01 -0500
I think another question to ask is how much are we willing to spend to fight spam. Justin Newton(in the NANOG meeting) mentioned $400 million as what *all* ISPs spent to deal spam.Actually, Vinny Bono came up with that number, not me.
I thought the number was 7,007 million. -a
Current thread:
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Mike Norris (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Turnando Fuad (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Steve Sobol (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard (Oct 31)