nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 23:56:31 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Matt Ryan wrote:
If people are having trouble with their mailservers dying under the spammers attack(!) then I would suggest they need a more scalable system.
Obviously, your servers have never been hit by thousands upon thousands of bounced spams returned in a short period of time by AOL. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/message. Florida Digital Turnpike | ______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dorn Hetzel (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Flores (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful NetSurfer (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Rik Schneider (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Martin Cox (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Rik Schneider (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)