nanog mailing list archives
Re: too many routes
From: Peter Lothberg <roll () Stupi SE>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 97 1:06:24 MET DST
Alan writes;
There is another router vendor who has OC-12 router interfaces
...
There is a choice in the market today for OC12 router interfaces. -alan
Let's try to define the terminolog; oc3 3*sts-1 (=3*ds3) oc3c 3*sts-1 concatenated (vc4, or one container 1920 bytes) oc12 12*sts-1 (=12*ds3) oc12c 12*sts-1 concatenated (can carry a STM-4, 7680 bytes) Most (all?) data equipment uses ocXXc chanels, so I asume that is what we are talking about. ATM OC12c-celltax = 'oc9' worth of IP traffic (467M) POS OC12c-frametax = 'oc11' worth of IP traffic ((580M) This is before we look at system performance, routers understand IP, Switches does not. -Peter
Current thread:
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Michael Dillon (Sep 12)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Paul Traina (Sep 12)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Tony Li (Sep 12)
- Message not available
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Richard Irving (Sep 15)
- Re: too many routes Dorian R. Kim (Sep 11)
- Re: too many routes Richard Irving (Sep 11)
- Hezbollah Alan Hannan (Sep 14)
- Re: Hezbollah Peter Kline (Sep 14)
- Re: Hezbollah Dorian R. Kim (Sep 14)
- Message not available
- Chanukah [was Re: Hezbollah] Kent W. England (Sep 16)
- Re: too many routes Alex.Bligh (Sep 12)