nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spammer Bust
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 06:59:14 -0700
Cool. Internet stormtroopers. I don't suppose anybody tried to call the kid or his parents or both before the "federal marshals and Rustnet officials on an Aug. 29 surprise visit to the high school student's home in Utica, MI. "? "The boy's parents apparently had no idea what their son was doing with the computer, according to sources". No, I thought not... So, I'm curious: should this model be put forward as a BCP? I mean we now have two independent implementations even (cf. the federal marshals, the ISP and the Religious Technology Center...). Sean.
Current thread:
- Spam protection for larger networks (Was Re: Spammer Bust), (continued)
- Spam protection for larger networks (Was Re: Spammer Bust) Rod Nayfield (Sep 05)
- Re: Spam protection for larger networks (Was Re: Spammer Bust) Peter Marelas (Sep 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Spammer Bust Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 05)
- Re: Spammer Bust Steve Mansfield (Sep 05)
- BGP blackholing spam [was Spammer Bust] Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Re: BGP blackholing spam [was Spammer Bust] Paul A Vixie (Sep 06)
- Re: BGP blackholing spam [was Spammer Bust] Alex.Bligh (Sep 06)
- Re: BGP blackholing spam [was Spammer Bust] Paul A Vixie (Sep 06)
- Re: BGP blackholing spam [was Spammer Bust] Jim Carroll (Sep 06)
- Re: BGP blackholing spam [was Spammer Bust] Paul A Vixie (Sep 06)
- Re: Spammer Bust Mark E Larson (Sep 05)
- Re: Spammer Bust Dannyman (Sep 05)