nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMURF amplifier block list
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 14:31:22 -0700
| Posting it here weekly only provides a mechanism for the littele fsckers | that smurf to gain an up to date list of sites to bounce from. And consequently increases the liklihood that more networks will refuse traffic to or from these networks, which in turn increases the pressure on these sites to wonder what is happening to their connectivity and how to repair it. Which may just solve the problem. This is a monumental admission: I think Karl is doing the right thing. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: Fixing RFC's WAS Re: SMURF amplifier block list, (continued)
- Re: Fixing RFC's WAS Re: SMURF amplifier block list Alex P. Rudnev (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Forrest W. Christian (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list E Pluribus Linux (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Shields (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Dillon (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Jason L. Weisberger (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Randy Bush (Apr 13)
- Message not available
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Ian McLaughlin (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list melinda b. thompson (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Dillon (Apr 11)
- Re: [nanog] Re: SMURF amplifier block list Stephen Balbach (Apr 11)
- Re: [nanog] Re: SMURF amplifier block list Jeremy Porter (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Rich Sena (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Paul A Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Dillon (Apr 12)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Rich Sena (Apr 12)