nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lame RFC1918 delegations
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 10:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the pointer Walt. Rodney, These delegations were being transitioned and there was a communication problem during the transition. That should be corrected (the last check earlier this morning had the correct servers in whois but the root zone may need to wait for tomorrows push) by no later than tomorrow. If this does not make it to the NANOG list, please feel free to forward as appropriate. --bill
Current thread:
- Lame RFC1918 delegations Joffe, Rodney (Apr 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Lame RFC1918 delegations bmanning (Apr 02)
- Lame RFC1918 delegations Barry Margolin (Apr 03)
- Re: Lame RFC1918 delegations bmanning (Apr 03)
- Re: Lame RFC1918 delegations Barry Margolin (Apr 03)
- Re: Lame RFC1918 delegations Kevin Steves (Apr 15)
- Re: Lame RFC1918 delegations bmanning (Apr 03)