nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: owen () DeLong SJ CA US (Owen DeLong)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 08:44:39 -0700
| I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX. If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and topology conventions.
Private Exchange. It is a private exchange between SPRINT and Exodus.
I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is what PX means. Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection. Are there others? If so, are they down or something? Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Neil J. McRae (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jon Lewis (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 13)
- What peering means [was Re: BBN Peering issues] Alex Bligh (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Scott Huddle (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Matt Sommer (Aug 14)
- FW: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Hank Nussbacher (Aug 15)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
(Thread continues...)