nanog mailing list archives
RE: BBN Peering issues
From: cheops POP <giza () cheops mv com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 22:21:59 -0400
If your traffic is largely based on "client" side applications then guess what, your gonna have a lot of in-bound traffic. This whining is tantamount to AT&T whining about MCI clients calling their moms who have AT&T long distance! If your business
duh! this is "settlement" as Jeremiah Kristal so kindly reminded me. I guess the idea of settlement seemed so bizarre I dismissed it. (if I could only hide behind the satire it was thought to be,=)
model doesn't account for such anomalies, what are ya gonna do? ask mom for a charge on her incoming calls?)
The point _was_ that if your highly dependent on dialup users who sit in front of a browser then your gonna get thwacked. I'll shutup now. -pete
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues sysadmin (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Jerry Scharf (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 19)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- re: BBN Peering issues Jerry Scharf (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Alex Bligh (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 17)
- BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 18)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Bradley Reynolds (Aug 18)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Martin, Christian (Aug 18)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 22)