nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAE-East - Operational question
From: Dorian Kim <dorian () blackrose org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 13:38:02 -0400
On Wed, Aug 19, 1998 at 05:35:57PM -0400, Jeff Barrows wrote:
- The peering session between Network A and Network B is traversing the network of FDDI switches at the IX, as the networks are not peering across a FDDI switch that they have in common, and the links are congested. Other things one can do : - Peering session can be moved to a FDDI switch that the two networks have in common.
The others, as you've observed are reasonably fixable problems, given inclination, but this last problem is non-trivial to fix, because of the physically distributed nature of some interconnects. I'm not yet certain as to whether ATM replacement of FDDI is the right solution to this problem. -dorian
Current thread:
- MAE-East - Operational question Alex Bligh (Aug 19)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Robert Hood (Aug 20)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Alan Hannan (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Jeff Barrows (Aug 20)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Dorian Kim (Aug 20)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Richard Irving (Aug 20)
- Message not available
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Richard Irving (Aug 20)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Dorian Kim (Aug 20)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Robert Hood (Aug 20)
- Re: MAE-East - Operational question Richard Almeida (Aug 24)