nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN/GTEI
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:28:46 +0800
In the past we have considered the initiator of IP transactions to be irrelevant and had no-charge peering for networks that basically send a similar number of bytes to what they receive. So what do we do when that is no longer the case?
Pray someone doesn't write a call-back protocol, so traffic flows in the opposite direction from the original initiator of the IP 'transaction'. That becomes popular in a webbrowser. Or a popular game. Then you'd have to monitor more information than just total traffic flow in and out of an interface. For video and voice over IP type services, the traffic flow should (largely) be symetrical. But what else would be that makes this issue complicated? Right now the name of the game is content. Email, web, news, realaudio, realvideo. Later on when interactive (ie symetric traffic) applications like voice/video over IP come into play, wouldn't it make more sense to handle 'interconnecting' between two different voice/video services by some other way? (Please, if I've missed something here, I'd be glad to know...) Puzzled, Adrian
Current thread:
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI), (continued)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Michael Dillon (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Mike Leber (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) John A. Tamplin (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Adrian Chadd (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Mike Leber (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Adrian Chadd (Aug 22)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Mike Leber (Aug 23)
- Re: Transaction Based Settlements Encourage Waste (was Re: BBN/GTEI) Michael Dillon (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Adrian Chadd (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 22)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN/GTEI Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 22)
- Re: BBN/GTEI bmanning (Aug 24)
- There's no substitute for value, was Re: BBN/GTEI John R. Levine (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 22)