nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () millburn net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:19:00 -0400 (EDT)
Well basically you need to think of it like this. If the providers that are getting cut were actually "peers" of BBN, then BBN would feal the pain, in fact they are not "peers". BBN can cut them off their network and will not feal a thing. BBN customers will still be able to reach the cut ISPs from their transit providers. If the providers were "peer" then when BBN tried to cut them they both would feal the pain and BBN would most likley turn it back up in a hour or so.
I was under the impression that, by this definition, BBN considered Exodus to be a "peer". Is this not the case?
Current thread:
- BBN Peering issues Dave Rand (Aug 11)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Nathan Stratton (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Dillon (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Roeland M.J. Meyer (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Gary E. Miller (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues John Butler (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Deepak Jain (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Nathan Stratton (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jon Lewis (Aug 13)