nanog mailing list archives
Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: 08 Feb 1998 16:46:42 -0500
Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com> writes:
Okay. Playing my usual devil's advocate role, please tell me what migration path lies beyond FDDI for faster connectivity?
SM FDDI -> SM POS. Problem solved. Reuse your fibre, even. Your inventive marketing friend, Sean.
Current thread:
- FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Charles Sprickman (Feb 05)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Kent W. England (Feb 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Charles Sprickman (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Lewis Eatherton (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Dean Anderson (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Paul Ferguson (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Matthew Petach (Feb 08)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet David Lesher (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Dorn Hetzel (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Martin Hannigan (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Karl Denninger (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)