nanog mailing list archives
Re: route ingress
From: Jeremy Porter <jerry () fc net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 00:30:54 -0600
Love to hear something about this at Nanog. Even if just a 5 minute thing, saying, hey operators, your going to need this, read it, comment on it, beat your favorite router vendor(s) to impentlement it. In message <199801010626.WAA21612 () chimp juniper net>, Tony Li writes:
| Are there any pointers? There will be an ID as soon as it's cooked. Expect it this month (Jan). Tony | > The only real solution is strong cryptographical authentication of | > the ownership of routing prefixes. For some reason i do not see | > any serious work in that direction being done. | | Actually, it is being done. It's not ready for implementation yet.
--- Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc. jerry () fc net PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708 | 1-800-968-8750 | 512-458-9810 http://www.fc.net
Current thread:
- Re: route ingress Tony Li (Dec 31)
- Re: route ingress Jeremy Porter (Jan 05)
- new: SPAM with TCP-forgery Charles Howes (Jan 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: route ingress Sean M. Doran (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress John A. Tamplin (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress Sean M. Doran (Jan 08)
- Re: route ingress Vadim Antonov (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 07)
- Re: route ingress Sean M. Doran (Jan 08)
- Re: route ingress John A. Tamplin (Jan 06)
- Re: route ingress Vadim Antonov (Jan 07)
- Re: route ingress Jeremy Porter (Jan 05)