nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () jain com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 02:23:19 -0500 (EST)
UUNET doesn't own dedicated single-circuit copper to people's houses.
Okay, now lets talk about a wide-scale xDSL implementation using a reasonably well known POP architecture like UUNet's. If xDSL can only run about 18kft end-to-end, to service a wide metro area like Washington, D.C. one would either have to have a POP within every 6 mile radius (fed by conventional circuits) or backhaul the data (by conventional circuit) to their POP. Is this correct, if not, what am I missing? Thanks, -Deepak.
Current thread:
- Microsoft offering xDSL access Dean Morstad (Jan 22)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Adam Rothschild (Jan 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 22)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Adam Rothschild (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Henry Linneweh (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Deepak Jain (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access David Lesher (Jan 23)
- Re: [nanog] Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Stephen Balbach (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access ^Faust^ (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Greg Simpson (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Adam Rothschild (Jan 22)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access ^Faust^ (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Nathan Stratton (Jan 23)