nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd)
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 18:20:48 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Reed sez:
The 1987 proposal was abandoned in 1988. The current Access Reform proceeding is entirely separate.
But the END RESULT may well be same. Read it carefully.... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) NetSurfer (Jan 24)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Daniel Reed (Jan 24)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Marc Hurst (Jan 24)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) David Lesher (Jan 24)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Dean Anderson (Jan 26)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) David Lesher (Jan 26)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Nathan Stratton (Jan 26)
- Re: [Fwd: FCC to charge by minute for e-mail usage (fwd) Daniel Reed (Jan 24)