nanog mailing list archives
RE: Dijkstra Simulator
From: Rob Wilson <rwilson () supernews com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 21:15:24 -0700
Was that Exodus again.... Didn't you guys already take most of their clients anyway?? -----Original Message----- From: Alan Hannan [SMTP:alan () globalcenter net] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 1998 8:23 PM To: Jim Boyle Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Dijkstra Simulator
p.s. - how is that ip navigator treating you - is there any other than the big C? (oops -that's little c, isn't it?).
frontier globalcenter is not planning to use ip navigator in the core of our network today. we are moving away from ip/atm and towards ip/sonet&ip/wdm. We have 1 oc12 using packet over sonet up today, and several oc3s; phased deployment of oc12 and oc48 starting 3Q98 and completed in 1Q99. we are exploring using ip navigator in our l2 aggregation frame and atm networks. big C/A,J,T,L,N little c they all have reasonable products, just some are more reasonable than others. what really burns me is when a company we are working with under nda tells our competition what we are exploring, and when they publish press releases about their customers without that customers approval. -alan
Current thread:
- Re: Dijkstra Simulator Jim Boyle (Jun 11)
- Re: Dijkstra Simulator Alan Hannan (Jun 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Dijkstra Simulator Rob Wilson (Jun 12)