nanog mailing list archives

RE: Dijkstra Simulator


From: Rob Wilson <rwilson () supernews com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 21:15:24 -0700

Was that Exodus again.... Didn't you guys already take most of their clients anyway??


-----Original Message-----
From:   Alan Hannan [SMTP:alan () globalcenter net]
Sent:   Thursday, June 11, 1998 8:23 PM
To:     Jim Boyle
Cc:     nanog () merit edu
Subject:        Re: Dijkstra Simulator


p.s. - how is that ip navigator treating you - is there any other than the
big C? (oops -that's little c, isn't it?).

  frontier globalcenter is not planning to use ip navigator in the
  core of our network today.

  we are moving away from ip/atm and towards ip/sonet&ip/wdm.  We
  have 1 oc12 using packet over sonet up today, and several oc3s; phased 
  deployment of oc12 and oc48 starting 3Q98 and completed in 1Q99.

  we are exploring using ip navigator in our l2 aggregation frame
  and atm networks.

  big C/A,J,T,L,N little c they all have reasonable products, just 
  some are more reasonable than others.

  what really burns me is when a company we are working with under
  nda tells our competition what we are exploring, and when they
  publish press releases about their customers without that
  customers approval.

  -alan



Current thread: