nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smurf Amps List
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 11:01:09 -0400
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Jared Mauch wrote: If you added a scan to check the class B nets as /24 nets I am pretty sure you would get a huge increase in broken nets.
I'm sure that would be the case also. I could start to scan a lot of netblocks a lot closer, but did not due to the length of time it took to run these blocks. It took me 6 days to perform this inital report, which points a quite a number of "broken" netblocks. Interesting enough, of all these blocks, I only got one e-mail from someone saying "kindly stop pinging our network address" one day after I did so. I hope to be able to do some future sweeps of netblocks. I assure you that anything which happens on this will be posted when there are new things happening. - Jared
Current thread:
- Smurf Amps List Jared Mauch (Jun 12)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 13)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jared Mauch (Jun 13)
- Re: Smurf Amps List D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Jun 14)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jared Mauch (Jun 13)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jon Lewis (Jun 13)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jared Mauch (Jun 13)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jon Lewis (Jun 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 14)
- OFF TOPIC Erich A. Boehm (Jun 15)
- Re: OFF TOPIC Nathan Stratton (Jun 15)
- Re: OFF TOPIC Dean Anderson (Jun 15)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Jared Mauch (Jun 13)
- Re: Smurf Amps List Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 13)