nanog mailing list archives
Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR)
From: Paul Mansfield <paulm () uk psi com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 09:28:38 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Oystein Homelien wrote:
the prefix length is wrong, but in other cases i am at a loss - the hosts in the probed network actually seems to return more than one response per request. I have no idea why. We saw this with the 193.55.112.0/24 network, for instance (which has now been fixed).
this could be because a) there could be a 10.0 internal LAN remapped into a normal IP space? b) on some versions of unix, when you open /dev/icmp, you will receive ALL ICMP activity received by the machine, so if your application doesn't look too closely at the pongs (response to a ping :-), it might see response to other pings occurring Paul ---- P Mansfield, Senior SysAdmin PSINet, +44-1223-577577x2611/577611 fax:577600 :r~/humour/signature :wq
Current thread:
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Oystein Homelien (Jun 15)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Paul Mansfield (Jun 16)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Brandon Ross (Jun 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Richard Thomas (Jun 15)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Taner Halicioglu (Jun 15)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Paul Mansfield (Jun 16)