nanog mailing list archives

Re: Smurf Amp Nets


From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:50:56 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Oystein Homelien wrote:

You need to push the "probe=" parameter to the cgi as well.  What you are
doing above is merely looking up already-registered networks in the SAR
database.  Again, you are NOT probing the networks through the SAR by
running the above lynx command!

To do what you want, you must use URLs of this form:

http://www.powertech.no/smurf/probe.cgi?network=1.2.3.4&probe=PROBE

ack!  I somehow missed that when pasting the URL from Netscape into my
editor.  Here's an updated version.  Chris Bongaarts <cab () tc umn edu> sent
the 172.16/12 regex I was too lazy to include before.

#!/usr/bin/perl

while (<STDIN>) {
  ($net,$junk)=split /:/,$_,2;
  if (($net=~/\d+\.\d+.\d+/) && 
   !($net=~/^(0\.)|(10\.)|(192\.168)|(172\.((1[6-9])|(2[0-9])|(3[01]))\.)|(255\.255\.255)/)){ 
    system("lynx -dump 'http://www.powertech.no/smurf/probe.cgi?network=$net&probe=PROBE'";);
  }
  elsif ($net=~/---/) {
    die "\ndone.\n";
  }
}

I'm using this to make sure all the nets I recently posted about are
registered.  Based on the times reported by SAR, I think I'll be adding a
bunch of new nets to it.

------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net>  |  Spammers will be winnuked or 
 Network Administrator       |  drawn and quartered...whichever
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  is more convenient.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____





Current thread: