nanog mailing list archives
proxying: legal -> com-priv, etc.
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:13:19 -0700
hi - comments about legal and contractual issues involving transparent proxies belong in com-priv, please. "i will sue them!" "they are breaking the law!" "they are ripping me off!" do not belong here. comments about "intercepting http breaks end2endian internet" belong in end2end-interest, please. comments about "how do i configure this?" and "this broke something, how do i fix it?" belong, respectively, here and at noc () digex net, although a summary of problems and experiences on a technical level might be ok here. this, of course, is totally unrealistic to hope for. maybe someone will invent transparent redirection of email to the right addressees... Sean.
Current thread:
- proxying: legal -> com-priv, etc. Sean M. Doran (Jun 26)
- Re: proxying: legal -> com-priv, etc. Manar Hussain (Jun 26)
- Re: proxying: legal -> com-priv, etc. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 28)