nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP over SONET considered harmful?
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 18:09:15 -0500
At 02:57 PM 3/20/98 -0800, Kent W. England wrote:
As I recall, the world didn't end when the NSFNET NSSs were installed and they decremented TTL twice. Weren't they changed to decrement once, appearing as one instead of two routers?
Kent, the "width" of the Internet is a little wider than the NSFnet days. :-) - paul
Current thread:
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful?, (continued)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Alan Hannan (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Yakov Rekhter (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Joseph Malcolm (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Paul Ferguson (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Naiming Shen (Mar 23)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Paul E. Erkkila (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Joseph Malcolm (Mar 20)
- RE: IP over SONET considered harmful? Bill St. Arnaud (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Kent W. England (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Paul Ferguson (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Scott Brim (Mar 21)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? John G. Scudder (Mar 23)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Paul E. Erkkila (Mar 23)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? avg (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Martin Hannigan (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Paul Ferguson (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Vadim Antonov (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Stan Hanks (Mar 21)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Martin Hannigan (Mar 20)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Vadim Antonov (Mar 21)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 21)