nanog mailing list archives
Re: So, 11.3 anyone?
From: Peter Galbavy <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:28:34 +0000 (GMT)
So, a potential reason came up for me to possibly run 11.3. I really don't want to, but I am comtemplating it. Apparently, 11.3 has code to fast-switch policy-routed networks. Does it work? Is 11.3 really usable? I am scared to death, but may need this for a certain application. Any comments are welcome.
Not that I don't think Alex has useful things to say, but any chance of moving all this cisco oriented stuff to a cisco list ? -- Peter Galbavy @ Home in Wonderland http://www.wonderland.org/ http://www.whirl-y-gig.org.uk/ http://www.demon.net Be remembered not for your final destination, but for your journey.
Current thread:
- So, 11.3 anyone? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 11)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Peter Galbavy (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Christian Kratzer (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? jlixfeld (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 12)
- NetSpeed FireRunner 100 Dax Kelson (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? jlixfeld (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 12)