nanog mailing list archives
Re: Core router bakeoff?
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 12:09:52 +0100
On Thu, 07 May 1998 17:36:45 -0400 "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com> wrote: Bays software sucks, the ammount of hassle I've had with frame relay and ATM with Bay is a nightmare. The Ascend GRF-400 is an excellent choice.
Jon Green writes:Wait.. a Bay BCN will push 1 Gb/s through the box,Bay's have beautiful hardware architectures. The hardware is not the problem.but you are recommending a PC running GateD over a Bay router?At the low end, sure. They're cheap as all hell, easy to remote manage, easy to expand, and very efficient. With the right software, they are pretty damn nice. Lots of NSPs use the things these days -- Daemon in the U.K. used to do nothing but BSD boxes last time I checked. Perry
-- Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. neil () DOMINO ORG NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>
Current thread:
- Re: Core router bakeoff?, (continued)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? J.D. Falk (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Robert Sanders (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jon Green (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Andrew Bangs (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Robert Sanders (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Neil J. McRae (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Joe Warren-Meeks (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Nathan Stratton (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Steve Sobol (May 08)