nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft NOC?
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 11:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
My personal backup has always been carrier-pigeon. Let's not forget voice-over-cable and other voice-over-(pudding...) solutions that haven't been proven in mission-critical ways yet. -Deepak. On Fri, 8 May 1998, Justin W. Newton wrote:
At 07:52 AM 5/8/98 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:The reason it is imperative that there be a telephone number for an ISP is that it's really hard to use e-mail to contact an ISP if the network connectivity to the ISP is not working.Which will certainly be interesting when/if Voice Over IP happens. Hmm, whats next, network down, please use snail mail? Justin W. Newton
Current thread:
- Microsoft NOC? Kit Knox (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Reid B. Fishler (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Derek Balling (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Gary E. Miller (May 08)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft NOC? Kurt Parent (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Robert Sanders (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Justin W. Newton (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Deepak Jain (May 11)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)