nanog mailing list archives
Re: renumbering and roaming
From: Paul Mansfield <paulm () uk psi com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 09:40:23 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Daniel Reed wrote:
) Nah, good idea, but too many useful services with port numbers > 255, so
I think this seems nice, but gets complex, and as said breaks things, although you could use the full range of a /16. However, we'd really want TWO of everything, on different networks if possible to give resilience, hence why I proposed x.y.z.2 -> resolver x.y.z-1.2 -> resolver Paul ---- P Mansfield, Senior SysAdmin PSINet, +44-1223-577577x2611/577611 fax:577600 *** If a grand piano had a rubout key, I'd be a concert pianist by now! ***
Current thread:
- RE: renumbering and roaming Paul Flores (May 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: renumbering and roaming Paul Mansfield (May 19)
- Re: renumbering and roaming William Allen Simpson (May 19)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Clayton O'Neill (May 19)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Dean Anderson (May 19)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Charles Sprickman (May 19)
- RE: renumbering and roaming Peter Galbavy (May 20)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Karl Denninger (May 20)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Clayton O'Neill (May 19)
- RE: renumbering and roaming Peter Galbavy (May 20)